Zerona Laser Comparison & Review For Medical Spas

Zerona Laser Comparison & Review For Medical spas

This is a assessment and critique of Zerona lasers, a medical laser treatment that’s getting more widespread in laser centers, laser clinics and skin clinics. This unique overview pertains to an important study called Low Level Laser Therapy Effectiveness For Reducing Pain After Breast Augmentation, American Journal Of Cosmetic Surgery Volume 26, November 3rd, 2009. The entire study was first posted on Medical Spa MD.

1. The very first thing they teach you during medical school on how to measure scientific studies are who paid a commission for the study. In this instance the particular mentor of the research and paper was Erchonia the company that produces Zerona lasers.

2. Exactly who wrote the article? In this case this article appears to have been penned by Ryan Maloney. Who’s Ryan Maloney? He’s not only the medical director of Erchonia he ultimately is the owner of a patent of the Zerona laser. Aside from you don’t identify his experience. We find out he is not a PhD or doctor. Usually it will be behind his moniker in the authorship of the article. He shows a strong fiscal gain to create the article in a favorable light.

3. 8 subjects do not feature finalized measurements. The initial concern is why? Four had been from the treated group and four were in the placebo group. At first that looks OK, but after you examine deeper into it, they kept all of those test subjects within the study. They took the last measurements for all those subjects and took them forward. Again, it seems fine initially but after you start to look at the pattern of circumferential loss at the fourteen days post treatment the measurements are trending back again toward baseline. So if you ever incorporate these patient’s final measurement (which incidentally is the most desirable total average circumferential loss during the treatments for the treated group) and carry them forward they’ll artificially lower the real values fourteen days post treatment. All 8 of the subjects should have been removed from the report.

4. There’s no analysis of aesthetic effect. To have this be worth something you’d probably require before and after pics which are examined by several individuals who are blinded to what procedure the particular participant received. So, to put it differently, is a three inch loss aesthetically significant.

5. They do not express if members are male or female. Therefore the question is left, can it work as well on men as it may on women? This may be essential since males are inclined to have thicker skin. And so, will the laser penetrate as deep in men?

For anyone who is keen on figuring out what cosmetic surgeons and different MDs leading laser centers think about the modern Intense pulsed light (IPL) and aesthetic fractionated laser technology offerings out of Palomar, Sciton, Solta, Alma, Cutera, Candela, Cynosure, Lumenis, Syneron and others, as well as procedures like Thermage skin tightening, Slim Lipo, filler injections, fat melting and laser hair removal, be sure to check-out the cosmetic skin laser reviews on Medical Spa MD, a online community of medical professionals practicing cosmetic medicine.